Category: social skills
So we are all going to die
My friend IH hosted a lovely brunch yesterday morning that sprawled into lazy, all-afternoon affair that make me grateful to be a graduate student and not someone punching a nine-to-five. There was the suggestion that we might rally and get some grading done together, but I’ve yet to ever see that work out in practice. Instead we had a long discussion about childhood. Despite hailing from several different countries, it seems that that all of us clustered in the late-20-something age group were all at one point obsessed with dinosaurs and astronomy, whereas the generation directly below us was into Pokémon. I made some overblown argument that an interest in T-Rex and Pluto somehow made my generation cannier to science, but I now regret it. My interest in dinosaurs was probably the first time my desires for a compulsively well-ordered universe reared their ugly head. I kept my plastic dinosaur collection in margarine containers categorized by era (Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, etc.) and hyperventilated at the thought of anachronistic play scenarios. I never became a paleontologist, nor could I even tell you anything insightful about dinosaurs now. I just found great comfort in schematizing their plastic world. I suppose this is the same type of comfort that the next generation found in their encounter with the world of Pokémon, so who am I to throw stones?
My crew and I went to see some pretty offensively bad video art last night at the Centre Pompidou. One of my New Year’s resolutions was to not be so damn critical of everything and everyone, so I guess in keeping with that I won’t detail everything that was wrong with this young woman’s oeuvre. My old therapist said that it is important to try and come up with one positive thing about a situation that is unpleasant overall. It took awhile for me to think of one for this experience, but here it is: this lady had a strong understanding of the literal. Suffice it to say that the audience dropped like flies. It takes a lot for me to leave a talk, concert, or screening early. Sadly, this is the second event that I’ve dragged my friends to in Paris that ended with stolen sideways glances and a quick shuffle to the exit. The first such flight was from a Williamsburg-based psyché-folk band that weaseled their way into a show at the Palais de Tokyo because the lead singer/gong clanger is Paul Laffoley’s assistant. I don’t even know how the Spanish video artist from last night got the Pompidou gig, but her work confirmed a sneaking suspicion I’ve held about video art for a long time, namely that it allows for any jackass with a camcorder to call themselves an artist. That’s ungenerous, I know, and there is a lot of video art that I genuinely respect and enjoy. But there is something terrifyingly democratic about the medium. Worst of all, she holds her MFA from my graduate school, making it an ugly day for institutional pride.
We saw an excellent screening of some of Paul Sharit’s films last Wednesday evening at the Pompidou. Especially rapturous was the silent Analytical Studies II: Unframed Lines of 1971-76, which uses the undulating projection line at the bottom of the screen to create some truly mesmerizing abstract imagery. Regrettably, the evening ended with Epileptic Seizure Comparison of 1976, in which footage of two epileptics undergoing induced seizures are interposed with colored panels that somehow mimic the brain waves of the patients. It’s loooong, and while conceptually interesting, it’s decidedly painful to actually watch. I mean, it’s basically watching someone have a seizure through a strobe light for a half-hour. However, having watched someone have a seizure through a strobe light for a half-hour becomes a useful litmus test for other experiences. Would you have rather watch a thirty-minute seizure or eat this casserole? Would you rather watch a thirty-minute seizure or listen to this Spanish video artist talk about Rousseau’s misogyny? Would you have rather watch a thirty-minute seizure or grade these 68 economics exams? It’s good to have a sense of precisely where you hit bottom and how close the experience you are currently undergoing is to the forehead-scrape.
Oh, Julia.
First off, fan mail! Just kidding. A friend obliged to read this blog writes: “When you said that you were going to give Clarence a blog, I thought that meant that you would be writing from his point of view.” Dearest reader, I thought about it, but let’s be honest. Clarence isn’t an especially verbal kid. He would certainly be flagged by Head Start if I let him out of the closet long enough to attend school. He communicates mainly by pointing, grunting, and having tantrums. So think of Clarence in Paris as a view into what makes Clarence happy, but with the addition of useful details about logistical issues (cost, walking, waiting, making reservations) that Clarence is loathe to consider.
* * *
Yesterday afternoon I went to see Julia Kristeva (swoon!) speak at the Museé du quai Branly, “where cultures speak to one another” and “indigenous” (read: places that were colonized by France at some point or another) art is exhibited in dark, vertiginous rooms that make you worry you are about to walk face-first into a sheet of glass. It’s a fancy space, likely made rich by the obscene number of tourists that come through after getting tired of waiting in line at the Eiffel Tower next door. One thing that they do at Branly that I’m pretty amped about is L’Université Populaire, a series of conferences and talks organized by Catherine Clément (somewhat smaller swoon!) about postcolonialism, psychoanalysis, and contemporary politics. The talk gave a general overview of Kristeva’s life and work and was well-handled for a general audience (think Inside the Actor’s Studio for rockstar academics). Kristeva was everything I had hoped she would be – exceedingly poised, articulate, and possessing of a sartorial sense that made her the ultimate antidote to Eileen Fisher-clad American female academics (or maybe that’s Hélène Cixous, who wanders around in a full-length fur). The only downside was that I had carried my dog-eared copy of Pouvoirs de l’horreur across town in hopes to have it signed. I nearly chickened out at the end of the talk, but my friends pushed me to the front of the auditorium where I stood, sweat-drenched and nervously muttering “Would you please sign my book?” in French over and over again so that I wouldn’t be dumbstruck when she got to me. Let’s just say that it was hardly 1964 and this was hardly Beatlemania. There were only three twitterpated fans up there, all of us waiting politely with well-worn copies of her books. But a diamond-clad hand fluttered and she was gone, and her assistant informed us that there would be no autographs today as Madame Kristeva was tired. It was terribly disappointing. I don’t want to say anything more about it than that. Except I do think I handled it with a bit more grace than the guy who loudly threw his copy of Les samouraïs (really?) down on the floor in exasperation. Manners count.
* * *
Last night I attended an extremely well-executed dinner party at the apartment of H and S, a couple who have been blessed with a disproportionate amount of good looks, culinary talent, and storytelling savvy between them. They are the kind of couple that would inspire rabid envy if they weren’t so damn nice. They made tacos de lengua complete with pico de gallo and guacamole, no small feat in a country where Mexican ingredients are sold in the same part of the grocery store as peanut butter, that is, the section for homesick expats. Also, can we say bonus points for cooking tongue at home? I didn’t snap any pictures of the two enormous tongues nestled in the pot together, but lemme tell you, what a sight for sore eyes! It was nice to know that I wasn’t the only person carrying the persistent dull ache for Mexican food and these kids miraculously hit the spot.
Afterwards we hit a heaving neighborhood bar with a huge hole in the front window that someone had driven through a few nights prior. My kind of place, you might say. Incidentally, I’ve decided that heaving, which my British friend uses instead of packed, is a far superior adjective. Let’s make that happen in America, shall we? Anyway, H was the target of one of the most amusing pick-up attempts in recent memory, cribbed directly from the Vh1 series The Pick-Up Artist (she knew about the show because her friend wrote a dissertation on reality television, I knew about the show because I’m a pop culture bottom-feeder). Broseph approached our group, sporting a too-tight button down, bad cologne, and full-fledged braces. As H remarked, “No Invisalign in France, I guess?” Broseph claimed he was taking a survey of the bar patrons for a “friend” (“Is it cheating if somebody makes out with someone who isn’t their boyfriend?”). He acted as though he was in a rush to talk to the next group of people (yet lingered for fifteen minutes). He paid a lot of attention to me (I was regrettably the not-as-hot friend of the target in this scenario). He looked at H and casually tossed out “You’re beautiful, too bad you’re not my type.” H and I confronted him about the schtick he was trying to pull (schtick was a word officially lost in translation) and walked away to another part of the bar. Amusingly, however, we then witnessed Broseph continue to woo our male friends, who are so starved for locally-grown masculine contact that they ended up spending a big chunk of the evening fraternizing with Broseph and his bad pickup lines. So while cribbing from The Pick-Up Artist may not get you the hot blonde American chick at the bar, it very well might garner you some of her Y-chromosome friends. Lesson learned?

